The park is between Division and Normandie St., Garland and LaCrosse.

We Will Not Bow

Our demonstration of moral strength is in opposition to the tyranny that threatens our very existence as a country. And this kind of gathering can unite us, in a moral movement to save America. And we will not stand down, not now, not ever. 

What can these protests accomplish?

3100 protests across the nation busts through that bubble, that air of inevitability, that Trump is invincible, unstoppable. 

The protests are not just in large cities but communities in rural and red parts of the country.

They are organizing not only for March 28 but for what comes next.  

Standing in a crowd matters

but it’s not enough

on its own

This moment is about turning frustration into movement, concern into commitment. If you’ve been wondering what you can do, this is where you start.

NO KINGS 3

Take Action – Do Something

At B A Clark Park in Spokane:

Bring a relative, bring a friend, bring a neighbor!

Speakers will address issues that stood out in Indivisible surveys of where support, resources and action were actually needed – the environment, affordability, voting rights, immigration, racial injustice, and government corruption.

Over 35 organizations will have tables with opportunities to learn what is happening and where to plug in.

Stand Up For Our Country!

Stand Up For Our Rights!

Stand Up For Our Neighbors!

When the choice is tyranny or revolution, to keep your head in the sand is to choose tyranny. If you choose revolution the question is nonviolent or violent.

The Scenario

1. A presidential candidate has won the election and gained control over all branches of government.
2. The new administration refuses to follow court rulings and historical norms.
3. Democratic processes and checks and balances have broken down.
4. The leadership style is modeled after authoritarian regimes like Russia, North Korea, and China.

This situation represents a significant threat to democratic institutions and the rule of law, which are fundamental to a functioning democracy.

Can We Trust This Man?

Options for Grassroots Movements

In such a scenario, grassroots movements and civil society organizations face a critical decision: whether to accept the new regime or to resist. Based on historical examples and research on civil resistance, there are several potential courses of action:

Nonviolent revolutions have endured longer

1. Nonviolent Revolution

Historically, nonviolent revolutions have been more successful and led to more stable democratic outcomes than violent uprisings. Research by Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan has shown that nonviolent campaigns are twice as likely to succeed as violent ones.

Strategies for nonviolent revolution could include:

a) Mass Mobilization: Organizing large-scale protests, strikes, and boycotts to demonstrate widespread opposition to the regime. This was effectively used in the Philippines People Power Revolution (1986) and the U.S. Civil Rights Movement (1950s-1960s).

b) Civil Disobedience: Engaging in coordinated acts of nonviolent resistance, such as sit-ins, blockades, or refusal to pay taxes. The Indian Independence Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi successfully employed these tactics.

c) Alternative Institutions: Creating parallel governance structures or “shadow governments” to challenge the legitimacy of the regime and provide essential services to the population.

d) International Solidarity: Appealing to international organizations and foreign governments for support and sanctions against the regime. This strategy was crucial in the South African Anti-Apartheid Movement.

2. Civic Engagement and Grassroots Organizing

Even in challenging political environments, there are legal and peaceful methods to resist authoritarianism:

a) Stakeholder Engagement: Identifying and mobilizing key stakeholders who can influence the political process.

b) Effective Communication: Using clear, consistent messaging to articulate grievances and demands.

c) Technology and Social Media: Leveraging digital platforms for organizing, information sharing, and mobilizing support.

d) Educational Interventions: Implementing programs to promote civic engagement and democratic values.

e) Building Trust and Relationships: Establishing networks of trust within communities to strengthen resistance efforts.

3. Seeking International Support

Grassroots movements can appeal to international democratic support systems and diplomatic channels:

a) International Organizations: Engaging with bodies like the UN, OSCE, and International IDEA to highlight democratic backsliding and seek support.

b) Foreign Diplomatic Pressure: Encouraging democratic nations to exert diplomatic pressure on the regime, similar to Sweden’s “Drive for Democracy” initiative.

c) NGO Partnerships: Collaborating with international NGOs like Freedom House to document and publicize human rights violations and democratic erosion.

Violent Revolution as a Last Resort

While violent revolution might seem like an option, it’s important to note that:

1. Violent uprisings are statistically less likely to succeed than nonviolent movements.
2. They often lead to prolonged conflict and instability.
3. Violent revolutions can delegitimize the movement in the eyes of both domestic and international observers.
4. They may provide justification for increased repression by the regime.

Conclusion

In the face of democratic breakdown and the rise of authoritarianism, grassroots movements have historically been most successful when employing nonviolent strategies. These strategies, combined with effective civic engagement and international support, offer the best chance for restoring democratic norms and institutions.

The choice between accepting tyranny and forming a revolution is a complex one, with significant consequences. However, the historical record suggests that nonviolent revolutions, when well-organized and widely supported, can be effective in challenging even the most entrenched authoritarian regimes.

It’s crucial for grassroots movements to carefully consider their options, build broad coalitions, and maintain a commitment to nonviolent tactics to maximize their chances of success and minimize the risk of further destabilization or violence.

When tyranny and revolution appear to be the choices, which do you think we ought to choose? The choice should be made with deep thought. If you keep your head in the sand and refuse to recognize the current conditions, you have chosen tyranny.

But if you choose revolution the question is nonviolent or violent.

By Robert Lloyd

As I step into this conversation with young women artists, I aim to challenge and inspire critical thought while remaining respectful and open-minded. Our discussions can illuminate the complexities of feminism, art, and spirituality today. Thoughtful questions and a willingness to share experiences, create an environment where all voices can be heard and valued.

Navigating the ever-evolving landscape of art, feminism, and spirituality, one compelling discussion is the intersection of these themes in the lives of young women artists. As we engage I reflect on my unique perspective as an 80-year-old Black man. My goal is to bring thought-provoking insights, encourage critical reflection, and spark meaningful dialogue without veering into offensive territory.

Understanding “Woo-Woo”

The term “woo-woo” often evokes reflections on beliefs and practices that may seem abstract or disconnected from scientific reasoning. In creative circles, some embrace this term as a badge of honor, associating it with personal empowerment and spiritual exploration. However, it can also critique superficial spirituality. As we embark on this conversation, it’s essential to consider how artists interpret “woo-woo.”

– Do they view it as an essential facet of their creativity and identity?

– Is there a generational divide in understanding its significance?

– In what ways might their relationship with “woo-woo” reflect their artistic ethos?

Given my life experiences, I challenge perceptions by pushing to explore how “woo-woo” fits into the larger societal fabric—especially concerning intersectional feminism and the struggles of marginalized communities.

Themes for Exploration

1.  Generational Differences in Feminism: 

   How do today’s artists define feminism compared to past movements? Is there continuity with the legacies of Black feminists like Audre Lorde or bell hooks, or do these histories feel distant to them? I ask for reflection on the intersectionality of their work, ensuring it encompasses diverse voices, including those of older Black men and women.

2.  Art as a Political Tool: 

   Let’s delve into the role of art in challenging power structures. Is the motivation radical, or is it self-serving? Sharing experiences of art as activism during the Civil Rights Movement, how do they perceive their work’s political impact?

3.  Can We Critique “Woo-Woo” Culture?

   If artists embrace “woo-woo,” can we examine its implications? Does it risk becoming disconnected from pressing real-world issues like racism and poverty? Is “woo-woo” a privilege afforded to those not entangled in survival struggles? Can it reflect broader societal disparities?

4.  Race, Gender, and Privilege: 

   It’s crucial to discuss how race intersects with feminism and artistic practices. Are artists aware of how their perspectives might be shaped by whiteness? Black artists have integrated spirituality into their activism, reinforcing the connection between art and the fight for justice.

5.  Engaging the Audience: 

   Who is the intended audience for their art? Does it resonate with marginalized communities, or does it cater primarily to privileged and academic spaces? Let’s reflect on whether “woo-woo” artistic expressions can genuinely instigate change, or if they merely serve to bolster personal identities.

Provocative Yet Respectful Engagement

Navigating this conversation thoughtfully,  can we incorporate the following strategies?

–  Humor and Wit:  Using light-hearted humor can defuse tension. For instance, one might quip, “Woo-woo? Back in my day, we just called it nonsense! So, how have you all turned that into something meaningful?”

–  Personal Narratives:  Do you have any stories from your life, like the civil rights activism of my youth, that can illustrate your points clearly? I might ask, “When I was your age, we were marching in the streets. How does ‘woo-woo’ contribute to social change today?”

–  Acknowledging Humanity:  Even in critique, can we express admiration for the artists’ dedication, affirming, “We may not agree with everything, but we genuinely respect your passion for your art and beliefs.”

Here’s to a thought-provoking discussion—let’s encourage each other to think critically, respect one another’s beliefs, and navigate the intricacies of art and feminism together!

Resources for Further Exploration

  For those interested in deepening this conversation, consider engaging with works that explore feminism, intersectionality, and the role of art as a catalyst for change. Notable books include: Sister Outsider by Audre Lord and Ain’t I a Woman by bell hooks.  Additionally, examining the Black Arts Movement and critical perspectives on “woo-woo” culture may help illuminate some of these discussions.

Gallery For Community & Culture

Millions of people marching in the streets across the United States and 10,000 – 20,000 marching here in Spokane. The marchers are asking a fundamental question: How do we preserve democracy when so many of our neighbors seem willing to trade it for the promise of security?

It appears that there is a great deal of fear dividing our country in two. Why these fears, what needs to be done, and how can we do it? What do our readers think? What does our community think? What do others think?  

This is a three part series.  The first part describes the fears and what needs to be done to address them. The second part addresses why Black people should resist the loss of democracy, the third part deals with what needs to be done. Later articles can follow the progress of the Spokane fight for democracy.

The articles discuss various evidence-based approaches to enhance democratic resilience and social cohesion at government, institutional, and individual levels. They highlight the importance of economic interventions, leadership strategies, educational reforms, media responsibility, and personal engagement. The text outlines measures for specific demographic concerns while emphasizing the need for systemic changes and the importance of measuring success. Key factors for success include authenticity, inclusivity, patience, consistency, local focus, and bipartisan support.

Feedback from social media posts and interactions can be used to invite them to remove the fear, save democracy and participate in building a better community they want to live in.

Read the first article in the Fighting Fear series:

1. Why Are People So Afraid That They Choose Tyranny Over Democracy

2. Why Blacks Will Resist the Loss of Democracy

3. What Needs To Be Done to Relieve Fear?

4. Join Fighting Fear and Volunteer

SUBSCRIBE: If you want suggestions on what we must do in addition to protesting in the streets, subscribe to 4comculture.com. Go to the top of the sidebar and send us your email address.

October 18th millions marched. They said NO TRUMP! In order to stop tyranny now what do you want to do?

When the choice is tyranny or revolution, to keep your head in the sand is to choose tyranny. If you choose revolution the question is nonviolent or violent.

The Scenario

1. A presidential candidate has won the election and gained control over all branches of government.
2. The new administration refuses to follow court rulings and historical norms.
3. Democratic processes and checks and balances have broken down.
4. The leadership style is modeled after authoritarian regimes like Russia, North Korea, and China.

This situation represents a significant threat to democratic institutions and the rule of law, which are fundamental to a functioning democracy.

Can We Trust This Man?

Options for Grassroots Movements

In such a scenario, grassroots movements and civil society organizations face a critical decision: whether to accept the new regime or to resist. Based on historical examples and research on civil resistance, there are several potential courses of action:

Nonviolent revolutions have endured longer

1. Nonviolent Revolution

Historically, nonviolent revolutions have been more successful and led to more stable democratic outcomes than violent uprisings. Research by Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan has shown that nonviolent campaigns are twice as likely to succeed as violent ones.

Strategies for nonviolent revolution could include:

a) Mass Mobilization: Organizing large-scale protests, strikes, and boycotts to demonstrate widespread opposition to the regime. This was effectively used in the Philippines People Power Revolution (1986) and the U.S. Civil Rights Movement (1950s-1960s).

b) Civil Disobedience: Engaging in coordinated acts of nonviolent resistance, such as sit-ins, blockades, or refusal to pay taxes. The Indian Independence Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi successfully employed these tactics.

c) Alternative Institutions: Creating parallel governance structures or “shadow governments” to challenge the legitimacy of the regime and provide essential services to the population.

d) International Solidarity: Appealing to international organizations and foreign governments for support and sanctions against the regime. This strategy was crucial in the South African Anti-Apartheid Movement.

2. Civic Engagement and Grassroots Organizing

Even in challenging political environments, there are legal and peaceful methods to resist authoritarianism:

a) Stakeholder Engagement: Identifying and mobilizing key stakeholders who can influence the political process.

b) Effective Communication: Using clear, consistent messaging to articulate grievances and demands.

c) Technology and Social Media: Leveraging digital platforms for organizing, information sharing, and mobilizing support.

d) Educational Interventions: Implementing programs to promote civic engagement and democratic values.

e) Building Trust and Relationships: Establishing networks of trust within communities to strengthen resistance efforts.

3. Seeking International Support

Grassroots movements can appeal to international democratic support systems and diplomatic channels:

a) International Organizations: Engaging with bodies like the UN, OSCE, and International IDEA to highlight democratic backsliding and seek support.

b) Foreign Diplomatic Pressure: Encouraging democratic nations to exert diplomatic pressure on the regime, similar to Sweden’s “Drive for Democracy” initiative.

c) NGO Partnerships: Collaborating with international NGOs like Freedom House to document and publicize human rights violations and democratic erosion.

Violent Revolution as a Last Resort

While violent revolution might seem like an option, it’s important to note that:

1. Violent uprisings are statistically less likely to succeed than nonviolent movements.
2. They often lead to prolonged conflict and instability.
3. Violent revolutions can delegitimize the movement in the eyes of both domestic and international observers.
4. They may provide justification for increased repression by the regime.

Conclusion

In the face of democratic breakdown and the rise of authoritarianism, grassroots movements have historically been most successful when employing nonviolent strategies. These strategies, combined with effective civic engagement and international support, offer the best chance for restoring democratic norms and institutions.

The choice between accepting tyranny and forming a revolution is a complex one, with significant consequences. However, the historical record suggests that nonviolent revolutions, when well-organized and widely supported, can be effective in challenging even the most entrenched authoritarian regimes.

It’s crucial for grassroots movements to carefully consider their options, build broad coalitions, and maintain a commitment to nonviolent tactics to maximize their chances of success and minimize the risk of further destabilization or violence.

When tyranny and revolution appear to be the choices, which do you think we ought to choose? The choice should be made with deep thought. If you keep your head in the sand and refuse to recognize the current conditions, you have chosen tyranny. But if you choose revolution the question is nonviolent or violent.

If you want suggestions on what we must do in addition to protesting in the streets, subscribe to 4comculture.com. Go to the top of the sidebar and send us your email address.

Equal rights 
For every voice 
Justice fair 
Should be the choice 
No Kings     

They hold the crown
You hold the load  
Stand together 
Change the road   
No Kings  

The power’s yours  
It’s in your hands  
Build a world  
That truly stands
No Kings  

Truth and love  
Will light the way
No one rules 
We all have say
No Kings       

Each set of signs uses the rhythmic, rhyming style of the original Burma-Shave ads while conveying social justice themes like equality, collective power, and rejecting authoritarianism or hierarchical rule. The final line, “No Kings” delivers a punchy, memorable conclusion in the same way Burma-Shave signs ended with their product name.

Maybe you would like to add these to your protest signs. 

Write your own rhyming verses and share them with us in a comment below. 

CLICK to view article

Envisioning and Living the Future

To build a future worthy of our highest hopes we must describe what we seek. We must describe in ways that invite others to join us. This vision isn’t just rhetoric—it’s a lived practice. It means:

• Justice for all and lifting up the disadvantaged must be at the center of our movement.
• We are called to dismantle unjust criminalization systems and insist on equal protection under the law.
• Our vision is not complete until we commit to ending poverty and systemic racism. We also must commit to ending the war economy that perpetuates suffering at home and abroad.
• We must also end ecological devastation, recognizing that justice is inseparable from the health of our planet.

Identifying Allies and Adversaries

Dr. King taught us to discern between those who oppose justice and those who simply differ in approach.

Ask:

• Do we share a vision for a world where the marginalized are protected?
• Are we united in building bridges across lines of division?
• Do we seek to transform the political, economic, and moral structures of society so all can live with dignity?

If we agree on these foundations, even if our strategies diverge, we are not enemies. True opposition lies in those who divide, dehumanize, or deny justice.

Building Unity and Integrity

• Unity is not about erasing differences, but about uniting under a moral narrative that puts people first.
• Our work must be non-partisan and sustained, recognizing that justice is not a one-time event but a continuous struggle.
• Nonviolence is both our method and our message, ensuring our integrity is never undermined by hate.

Living the Principles

It’s easy to talk about justice and peace; it’s harder to live these values every day. We must:

• Include even those who oppose us, for justice and peace must be for all, not just those we like.
• Let love for humanity guide us, using our anger to fuel change, but never letting hate dictate our actions.

A Vision for All

We must unite—across race, religion, ideology, and background—if we share this vision. We are a time when hate, xenophobia, patriarchy, white supremacy, and fascism are on the rise. Our response must be a movement rooted in Dr. King’s principles:

• Justice for all
• Protection for the marginalized
• Unity and nonviolence
• Transformation of society’s core structures
• A deep commitment to sustained, moral action

Closing Thought

We can use our anger to fuel us. However love for humanity must guide us as we build this new world. By grounding ourselves in these 14 principles, we honor Dr. King’s unfinished work and ensure our movement remains both visionary and actionable.

The psychological traits of true believers in mass movements can be observed in the followers of contemporary political figures like Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, and Bernie Sanders.

See the article for details: CLICK HERE