Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Robert Lloyd Artist & Advocate

Building The Community You Are Looking For

Robert Lloyd Artist & Advocate

Main menu

  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Mission 2025
  • Empowerment
    • Navigating Civil Disobedience
    • EMPOWERMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND RESOURCES
    • People Get Ready There’s a Train a Comin’
    • Who Are the True Believers?
  • Tools
    • Mobilizing Effective Political Power with Five Calls
    • 198 NV Actions
  • Culture
  • History
  • NOW

Category Archives: Civil Engagement

Post navigation

← Older posts

EMPOWERMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND RESOURCES

ORGANIZATIONS

Local

  • SCAR: Spokane Community Against Racism
  • PJALS: Peace & Justice Action League of Spokane
  • Spokane Indivisible Group Facebook
  • Spokane Indivisible Substack
  • Indivisible Spokane
  • Eastside Gladiators: Be the Change 509 Group Facebook
  • Veterans for Peace
  • Spokane NAACP
  • League of Women Voters
  • Spokane 2024 and Beyond – Spokane chapter of Red, Wine & Blue’s TroubleNation
  • Nuestras Raices Centro Communitario
  • Latinos en Spokane
  • Manzinita House Spokane
  • Refugee & Immigrant Connections Spokane
  • Mujeres in Action

State/Regional

  • Washington Indivisible
  • Eastern Washington Indivisible: Cynthia Hamilton
  • FUSE
  • 50501 Movement Washington

National

  • 50501 Movement
  • Indivisible

International

EVENTS

ACTIONS

PUBLICATIONS AND RESOURCES

  • https://www.saveusa.me Spokane events and actions to save our country
  • Spokane Stands Up
  • 4comculture.com: For Building: Community, Empowerment & Culture online posting

PLACES

  • Carl Maxey Center
  • Martin Luther King Jr. Center

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Actions, Civil Engagement, Community, Direct Action, Empowerment, Protest

How We Take Action After the Mass Protests #1 Campaign Template

1

Long-Term Mission:

To transform community energy into collaborative solutions that address our shared fears and build the inclusive, thriving community we all want to live in. Many of us have experienced being the sole representative of our demographic in professional or community settings, or have attended meetings where predetermined agendas don’t align with our authentic concerns.
As someone who has navigated being part of a small percentage of African Americans in a predominantly white city, I’ve observed how organizations often approach inclusion through tokenism rather than meaningful engagement—a reality that can feel both frustrating and isolating. This plan leverages the energy from recent demonstrations and channels it into constructive, solution-focused action.

Phase 1: Foundation Building (Weeks 1-3)

[A] Digital Outreach Strategy:

  • Website landing page with clear campaign overview and sign-up
  • Social media campaign targeting both demonstration groups with bridge-building messaging
  • Email templates for stakeholder outreach
  • Digital toolkit with shareable graphics and talking points

[B] Stakeholder Mapping & Outreach: Priority Contacts:

  • Educational: Eastern Washington University, Community Colleges of Spokane, Spokane Public Schools
  • Faith-based: Interfaith Council, individual congregations from diverse traditions
  • Community: Libraries, YMCA/YWCA, community centers, neighborhood councils
  • Business: Chamber of Commerce, downtown business associations
  • Civic: City Council members, county commissioners, local nonprofits
  • Media: Spokesman-Review, local radio stations, community newsletters

Please specify any thoughts or ideas on individuals or organizations you would like to see participate. Add them in the white Thoughts and Ideas box at the end of the document, including topic letter [B].

[C] Develop Letter Template for Stakeholders

Phase 2: Session Design & Launch (Weeks 4-6)

[D] Meeting Structure (2-hour format):

Opening (15 minutes):

  • Welcome and ground rules for respectful dialogue
  • Brief overview of campaign goals
  • Icebreaker: “One thing you love about our community”

Solutions Overview (45 minutes):

  • Present research-backed solutions (using our conversation as base)
  • Focus on local applications of broader strategies
  • Interactive elements: polling, small group discussions

Action Planning (45 minutes):

  • Break into working groups by interest area
  • Develop 3-month action plans with specific commitments
  • Identify next meeting dates and responsibilities

Wrap-up (15 minutes):

  • Share group commitments with full room
  • Sign-up for follow-up communications
  • Evaluation forms

[E] Working Group Categories:

  • Economic Solutions: Job training, small business support, cooperative development
  • Educational Initiatives: Civic education, media literacy, cross-cultural programs
  • Community Building: Interfaith dialogue, neighborhood connections, cultural events
  • Policy & Governance: Local government engagement, voting access, transparency
  • Youth & Families: School programs, childcare, mentorship
  • Health & Wellness: Mental health, substance abuse, community safety

Phase 3: Technology Integration

[F] Digital Tools Setup:

  • Registration system (Google Forms or Eventbrite)
  • Live note-taking (Google Docs collaborative editing)
  • AI transcription (Otter.ai or similar for accessibility)
  • Summary generation (ChatGPT or Claude for quick summaries)
  • Communication hub (WhatsApp groups or Slack channels by working group)

Are you using any AI software? Do you have any opinions?

Documentation Process:

  • Pre-session: Share background materials via email
  • During session: Take notes on provided worksheets and share them
  • Post-session: AI-generated summary distributed within 24 hours
  • Follow-up: Action item tracking and progress updates

Phase 4: Sustained Engagement (Ongoing)

Monthly Cycle:

  • Week 1: Working group meetings (action planning)
  • Week 2: Implementation activities
  • Week 3: Cross-group coordination meeting
  • Week 4: Community-wide progress sharing

Quarterly Milestones:

  • Month 3: First major collaborative project launch
  • Month 6: Policy proposal presentation to city council
  • Month 9: Community festival celebrating progress
  • Month 12: Annual report and expansion planning

Budget-Conscious Implementation

[G] Free/Low-Cost Resources:

  • Venue partnerships (free space in exchange for programming)
  • Volunteer facilitators from community organizations
  • Student volunteers from colleges for tech support
  • In-kind donations (printing, refreshments, supplies)
  • Grant opportunities (community foundation, civic engagement grants)

[H] Potential Funding Source Examples:

  • Spokane Community Foundation
  • Washington State Community Engagement grants
  • Local business sponsorships
  • Crowdfunding for specific projects

[I] Messaging Strategy

Core Messages – Discussion:

  • “From demonstration to collaboration”
  • “Solutions, not just problems”
  • “Building the community we all want to live in”
  • “Every voice matters, every action counts”

Bridge-Building Language Examples:

  • Focus on shared values (safety, prosperity, opportunity)
  • Use inclusive pronouns (“we,” “us,” “our community”)
  • Emphasize local identity (“Spokane strong,” “Inland Empire values”)
  • Avoid partisan language or blame

Success Metrics

Short-term (3 months):

  • Number of organizations partnering
  • Attendance at sessions
  • Working groups formed
  • Action commitments made

Medium-term (6-12 months):

  • Projects launched
  • Policy proposals submitted
  • Cross-demographic relationships formed
  • Media coverage and community awareness

Long-term (12+ months):

  • Measurable community improvements
  • Sustained participation
  • Model replication in other communities
  • Institutional changes adopted

Risk Management

[J] Potential Challenges – Examples:

  • Polarization: Some may see this as naive or partisan
  • Burnout: Volunteer fatigue after initial enthusiasm
  • Capture: Single-issue groups dominating agenda
  • Resources: Scaling beyond initial capacity

[K] Mitigation Strategies:

  • Clear ground rules and professional facilitation
  • Rotating leadership and shared responsibility
  • Diverse steering committee with broad representation
  • Phased growth rather than rapid expansion

This approach transforms post-demonstration energy into sustained, solution-focused community building. It’s scalable, technology-enhanced, and designed to bridge divides rather than deepen them. The key is starting small, proving the concept, and growing organically based on community response.

We are interested in hearing from you. Please leave a comment.

If you’d like to volunteer for this campaign to fight fear, fill out the form below and say why this might be of interest to you. Please specify any thoughts or ideas you would like to contribute in the comment field below. Specify the paragraph letter that you are commenting on.

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning
Warning
REQUIRED

Warning
Warning
Warning.

You’ve read this page. Review the “Open Letter to Our Spokane Community” https://4comculture.com/archives/19543 and share it with anybody you think would be interested.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Actions, Civil Engagement | 1 Reply

Who Are the True Believers?

Posted on July 23, 2025 by Robert Lloyd
Reply

The psychological traits of true believers in mass movements can be observed in the followers of contemporary political figures like Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, and Bernie Sanders.

See the article for details: CLICK HERE

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Actions, African American, African American Voice, BIPOC Artists, Black - African American, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Civil Rights Movement, Community Icons, Direct Action, Grassroots Organizing, Hate Studies, Politics, Social Justice, The Alliance for Media Arts + Culture, Veterans For Peace Spokane, Volunteers | Leave a reply

Social Media Platforms in Protests & Civil Disobedience

Posted on July 17, 2025 by Robert Lloyd
Reply

Social media platforms are central tools in organizing, amplifying, and documenting protest movements, including both legal demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience. Their influence extends to nearly every phase of modern activism.

Key Functions of Social Media in Protests

Organization and Mobilization

    • Rapid Communication: Platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram enable instant alerts and updates to large audiences.
    • Event Coordination: Details about protest times, locations, and changes can be distributed quickly.
    • Recruitment: Movements reach new supporters, often beyond traditional activist circles.

    Information Sharing

      • Education: Infographics, videos, and threads explain protest goals, legal rights, and safety tips.
      • Real-Time Updates: Live streams and posts provide on-the-ground news, especially when mainstream media coverage is lacking.
      • Resource Distribution: Legal aid contacts, medical help, or transportation details are easily shared.

      Public Awareness and Narrative Control

        • Framing the Message: Movements can frame their demands and actions, independently of government or traditional media narratives.
        • Viral Content: Hashtags and viral posts can bring national or global attention to local issues quickly.

        Documentation and Evidence

          • Recording Events: Videos and photos document both peaceful protest and any incidents of violence or repression.
          • Accountability: Livestreams and real-time sharing can deter misconduct by authorities and provide evidence for legal defense.

          Solidarity and Morale

            • Community Building: Supporters express solidarity, encourage one another, and build a sense of collective purpose.
            • International Support: Protests in one country can inspire or support similar movements elsewhere. Risks and Challenges

            Surveillance and Infiltration

              • Monitoring: Law enforcement may monitor public posts or infiltrate private groups.
              • Data Collection: Social media data can be used in prosecutions or to target activists.

              Disinformation and Smear Campaigns

                • False Narratives: Opponents may spread misinformation or attempt to discredit the movement.
                • Trolling and Harassment: Activists may face online abuse or threats.

                Privacy Concerns

                  • Doxxing: Personal information may be exposed.
                  • Platform Policies: Posts or accounts can be removed, limiting reach or erasing documentation. Best Practices for Protesters on Social Media
                  • Use Encrypted Messaging Apps: For sensitive coordination, prefer Signal, Telegram (private chats), or similar platforms.
                  • Limit Location Sharing: Disable geotags and avoid posting live locations unless necessary.
                  • Use Pseudonyms: Protect personal identity where possible.
                  • Fact-Check Information: Prevent spread of rumors or unverified claims.
                  • Backup Important Content: Download key videos/photos in case accounts are suspended or content is removed. Conclusion

                  Social media is a double-edged sword: It empowers protest movements with unprecedented coordination and amplification, but also exposes activists to risks. Effective protest training now always includes a section on digital security, smart communication, and narrative control through social media.

                  Share this:

                  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                  • More
                  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                  Like this:

                  Like Loading...
                  Posted in Actions, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Direct Action | Leave a reply

                  Organizing Effective and Peaceful Protest Training

                  Pre-Workshop Preparation


                  -Legal consultation: Connect with civil rights attorneys familiar with local protest laws
                  -Venue selection: Choose accessible locations with proper facilities
                  -Materials: Prepare handouts on legal rights, emergency contacts, and safety protocols

                  Workshop Agenda Structure

                  Session 1: Legal Rights and Responsibilities (60 minutes)

                  • Know your constitutional rights (1st Amendment protections)
                  • Understanding permit requirements and legal protest zones
                  • Interaction protocols with law enforcement
                  • Legal observer roles and documentation
                  • What to do if arrested

                  Session 2: Nonviolent Resistance Principles (45 minutes)

                  • Historical context and effectiveness of peaceful protest
                  • De-escalation techniques
                  • Maintaining discipline under pressure
                  • Building coalition and inclusive messaging

                  Session 3: Safety and Security (45 minutes)

                  • Personal safety protocols
                  • Communication systems and emergency contacts
                  • Identifying potential risks and exit strategies
                  • Medical considerations and first aid basics
                  • Digital security and privacy protection

                  Session 4: Effective Organization and Messaging (60 minutes)

                  • Clear goal setting and achievable objectives
                  • Media engagement and public communication
                  • Social media strategy and documentation
                  • Building sustainable movements
                  • Coordination with other groups

                  Session 5: Practical Scenarios and Role-Playing (45 minutes)

                  • Simulated interactions with counter-protesters
                  • Practice with media interviews
                  • Response to various law enforcement scenarios
                  • Group decision-making under pressure

                  Key Training Components

                  Facilitator Requirements:

                  • Experienced organizers or civil rights advocates
                  • Legal experts familiar with protest law
                  • Conflict resolution specialists
                  • Community leaders with grassroots experience

                  Follow-up Support:

                  • Ongoing legal hotline access
                  • Regular check-ins with participants
                  • Resource sharing networks
                  • Mental health and trauma support

                  The most effective protest training emphasizes peaceful, legal, and strategic action while ensuring participants understand both their rights and responsibilities as citizens engaging in democratic processes.

                  Share this:

                  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                  • More
                  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                  Like this:

                  Like Loading...
                  Posted in Actions, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Direct Action, Empowerment, Protest

                  Who Are the True Believers?

                  The Psychological Makeup of the “True Believer” in Eric Hoffer’s Book

                  Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements” (1951) is a seminal work that examines the psychology of individuals who become deeply committed to mass movements, whether political, religious, or social. Hoffer’s analysis focuses on the motivations and characteristics of these “true believers” and the conditions that make mass movements thrive.

                  Key Psychological Traits of the True Believer

                  1. Discontent with the Present Self: True believers often feel a deep dissatisfaction with their personal lives. They see themselves as ineffectual, powerless, or insignificant and seek to escape this reality by merging their identity with a larger cause or movement [1]. Hoffer argues that this dissatisfaction drives people to seek meaning and purpose in something external, often leading them to embrace ideologies that promise radical change.

                    2. Desire for Certainty and Simplicity: True believers are drawn to movements that offer clear, black-and-white answers to complex problems. They crave certainty and are often intolerant of ambiguity or nuance.

                    3. Willingness to Sacrifice Individuality: Hoffer notes that true believers are willing to subordinate their individuality to the collective identity of the movement. This allows them to feel part of something greater than themselves, which can be empowering but also leads to fanaticism.

                    4. Frustration and Resentment:!Many true believers harbor feelings of frustration and resentment, often directed at society, elites, or other groups they perceive as responsible for their struggles. This resentment fuels their commitment to the movement and their willingness to fight for its goals.

                    5. Faith in a Glorious Future: True believers are often motivated by a vision of a utopian future promised by the movement. This vision gives them hope and a sense of purpose, even if it requires sacrificing the present [2].

                    6. Susceptibility to Leadership: Hoffer emphasizes that true believers are often drawn to charismatic leaders who embody the ideals of the movement and provide a sense of direction and unity.

                      Comparison to Modern “True Believers”

                      The psychological traits Hoffer identified remain relevant today and can be observed in the followers of contemporary political figures like Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, and Bernie Sanders. While the specific ideologies and movements differ, the underlying motivations and behaviors of their most ardent supporters often align with Hoffer’s analysis.

                      1. Donald Trump: Many of Trump’s most devoted supporters exhibit traits of true believers, such as a strong desire for certainty, resentment toward perceived elites, and faith in Trump’s promises to “Make America Great Again.” His charismatic leadership and ability to channel frustration into a cohesive movement resonate with Hoffer’s description of mass movement dynamics.
                      2. Kamala Harris and Barack Obama: Supporters of Harris and Obama often emphasize their hope for a more inclusive and equitable future. While their movements may not exhibit the same level of fanaticism as others, the faith in their leadership and vision for change reflects some of the psychological traits Hoffer described, particularly the desire for a better future and identification with a collective cause [2].
                      3. Bernie Sanders: Sanders’ supporters often align with Hoffer’s analysis of frustration and resentment, particularly toward economic inequality and corporate power. His movement’s focus on systemic change and a vision of a more just society appeals to those seeking meaning and purpose through collective action.

                      Key Differences in Modern Contexts

                      While the psychological makeup of true believers remains consistent, modern mass movements are shaped by new factors:

                      • Social Media: Platforms like Twitter and Facebook amplify the reach of mass movements, allowing true believers to connect and organize more easily. This can intensify the sense of belonging and reinforce ideological echo chambers.
                      • Polarization: Modern politics is highly polarized, which can deepen the divide between opposing groups of true believers and increase the intensity of their commitment.
                      • Polarization: Modern politics is highly polarized, which can deepen the divide between opposing groups of true believers and increase the intensity of their commitment.
                      • Diverse Ideologies: Unlike the mid-20th century, today’s mass movements span a broader range of ideologies, from progressive to conservative, reflecting the complexity of modern societies.

                      Conclusion

                      Eric Hoffer’s insights into the psychology of the true believer remain strikingly relevant in understanding the dynamics of modern mass movements. Whether supporting Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, or Bernie Sanders, true believers today share many of the same psychological traits Hoffer identified: dissatisfaction with the present, faith in a better future, and a willingness to subordinate individuality to a collective cause. However, the tools and contexts of modern movements—such as social media and political polarization—have added new dimensions to the phenomenon.

                      Share this:

                      • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                      • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                      • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                      • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                      • More
                      • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                      • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                      • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                      • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                      • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                      • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                      Like this:

                      Like Loading...
                      Posted in Accomplice, African American Voice, BIPOC Artists, Black - African American, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Civil Rights Movement, Community Icons, Direct Action, Empowerment, Faith, PJALS, Politics, Poor People's Campaign, Trump, Veterans For Peace Spokane, Youth

                      Why Are People So Afraid That They Choose Tyranny Over Democracy


                      During the last few weeks millions have taken to US streets in urban, suburban and rural communities. They came to express their disapproval of the direction the government is moving. But why are so many others so afraid that they would choose a dictatorship, a monarchy or a strongman government? How can this be changed?

                      • Why these fears?
                      • Why Blacks will resist the loss of democracy
                      • What needs to be done?
                      • How can we do it?

                      why these fears?

                      This is a complex sociological and political question. Let’s break down the various fears and concerns that may influence support for authoritarian or strongman leaders.

                      Economic and Class-Based Fears

                      Working Class Concerns:

                      • Fear of continued economic displacement due to globalization and automation
                      • Anxiety about declining manufacturing jobs and wage stagnation
                      • Concerns about being “left behind” by rapid economic changes
                      • Fear of losing social status and economic security

                      Middle Class Anxieties:

                      • Worry about downward mobility for their children
                      • Healthcare cost concerns
                      • Education affordability fears
                      • Housing market pressures

                      Cultural and Social Fears

                      Demographic Change Anxiety:

                      • Fear of becoming a minority in traditionally majority-white communities
                      • Concerns about rapid cultural change
                      • Language and cultural preservation worries
                      • Immigration-related anxieties

                      Traditional Values Concerns:

                      • Fear of erosion of traditional family structures
                      • Religious freedom concerns
                      • Worry about changing gender roles and expectations

                      Demographic Breakdown

                      By Race/Ethnicity:


                      -White Americans (particularly rural/suburban): Higher rates of support often correlate with fears of demographic displacement, economic competition, and cultural change
                      -Hispanic Americans: Mixed patterns, with some supporting strong immigration enforcement due to economic competition concerns
                      -Black Americans: Generally lower support, but some concerns about economic competition and traditional values
                      -Asian Americans: Varied responses, with some supporting merit-based policies and law-and-order approaches

                      By Gender:


                      -Men: Often drawn to strongman imagery and promises of restored traditional masculine roles
                      -Women: More complex patterns, with some attracted to security promises while others concerned about reproductive rights and gender equality

                      By Age:


                      -Older Americans: Concerns about rapid social change and nostalgia for perceived “simpler times”
                      -Younger Americans: Generally less supportive, but some attracted to anti-establishment messaging

                      LGBTQ+ Community Considerations

                      The LGBTQ+ community generally show slower support for authoritarian movements due to:

                      • Historical persecution under authoritarian regimes
                      • Concerns about rollback of civil rights protections
                      • Fear of discrimination and marginalization

                      However, some subset concerns include:


                      -Security fears (particularly after incidents like the Pulse nightclub shooting)
                      -Economic anxieties that may override other concerns
                      -Single-issue voting on topics like immigration or taxes

                      Psychological and Social Factors

                      Authoritarian Personality Traits:

                      • Preference for order and hierarchy
                      • Discomfort with ambiguity and complexity
                      • Desire for clear, simple solutions
                      • Attraction to strong leadership figures

                      Social Identity Threats:

                      • Fear of group status decline
                      • In-group/out-group thinking
                      • Zero-sum worldview (believing others’ gains mean their losses)

                      Media and Information Environment

                      -Echo chambers reinforcing existing fears
                      -Disinformation amplifying perceived threats
                      -Social media algorithms promoting divisive content
                      -Declining trust in traditional institutions

                      Important Caveats

                      1.Individual variation: People within demographic groups have diverse views
                      2.Multiple motivations: Support often stems from combinations of factors
                      3.Context matters: Local conditions significantly influence attitudes
                      4.Temporal changes: These patterns shift over time with events and generational change

                      Why Blacks will Resist the loss of democracy

                      The fight against authoritarianism represents a continuation of a centuries-long struggle for true democratic participation and protection under law. CLICK HERE

                      Fighting Fear Articles

                      1. Why Are People So Afraid That They Choose Tyranny Over Democracy

                      2. Why Blacks Will Resist the Loss of Democracy

                      3. What Needs To Be Done to Relieve Fear?

                      4. Join Fighting Fear and Volunteer

                      This page provides examples of how you can be empowered. Feel free to look around 4comculture.com. Please also do research outside of the site.

                      • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Facebook
                      • Click to share on Mail (Opens in new window)Mail
                      • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)WhatsApp
                      • Share using Native toolsShareCopied to clipboard

                      Share this:

                      • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                      • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                      • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                      • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                      • More
                      • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                      • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                      • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                      • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                      • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                      • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                      Like this:

                      Like Loading...
                      Posted in Actions, Civil Engagement, Democracy, Education, Empowerment, Life Under Trump, Multicultural, Politics

                      198 Methods of Nonviolent Action

                      Posted on June 16, 2025 by Robert Lloyd
                      2

                      Practitioners of nonviolent struggle have an entire arsenal of “nonviolent weapons” at their disposal. Click here to see 198 of them, classified into three broad categories: nonviolent protest and persuasion, noncooperation (social, economic, and political), and nonviolent intervention. A description and historical examples of each can be found in volume two of The Politics of Nonviolent Action, by Gene Sharp

                      Share this:

                      • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                      • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                      • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                      • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                      • More
                      • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                      • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                      • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                      • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                      • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                      • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                      Like this:

                      Like Loading...
                      Posted in Actions, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Direct Action | 2 Replies

                      198 Methods of Nonviolent Action

                      Practitioners of nonviolent struggle have an entire arsenal of “nonviolent weapons” at their disposal. Listed below are 198 of them, classified into three broad categories: nonviolent protest and persuasion, noncooperation (social, economic, and political), and nonviolent intervention. A description and historical examples of each can be found in volume two of The Politics of Nonviolent Action, by Gene Sharp

                      Share this:

                      • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                      • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                      • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                      • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                      • More
                      • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                      • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                      • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                      • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                      • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                      • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                      Like this:

                      Like Loading...
                      Posted in Actions, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Direct Action

                      Call to Action

                      Posted on June 14, 2025 by Robert Lloyd
                      Reply

                      An ostrich can stop a tank when it takes its head out of the sand.

                      Keeping your head in the sand is to choose tyranny. Better to choose nonviolent revolution.

                      Read Choices Now: Tyranny or Revolution?

                      Share this:

                      • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
                      • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
                      • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
                      • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
                      • More
                      • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
                      • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
                      • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
                      • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
                      • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
                      • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

                      Like this:

                      Like Loading...
                      Posted in Actions, Civil Disobedience, Civil Engagement, Direct Action, Empowerment, Life Under Trump | Leave a reply

                      Post navigation

                      ← Older posts

                      SCROLL TO SEE OUR POSTS

                      We are often adding new posts and pages. Come back to browse our menu content and posts.

                      Robert J Lloyd

                      Robert J Lloyd

                      Citizen Activist building community I'd like to live in, Retired Professor Art, Photographer, Image Maker.

                      View Full Profile →

                      Recent Comments

                      • Angie Bee on Navigating Civil Disobedience
                      • Charles on Navigating Civil Disobedience
                      • Robert J Lloyd on How We Take Action After the Mass Protests #1 Campaign Template
                      • GEORGE EDWARD TAYLOR on Open Letter to Our Spokane Community
                      • GEORGE EDWARD TAYLOR on Open Letter to Our Spokane Community

                      Subscribe to Blog via Email

                      Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

                      Join 53 other subscribers

                      Meta

                      • Log in
                      • Entries feed
                      • Comments feed
                      • WordPress.org

                      Building the community you are looking for.

                      Join us in building the community you are looking for by telling your stories, telling us what is going on in your organizations, posting events, participating in surveys and polls. Subscribe to the site, become a contributor.

                      The Spokane African American Voice does not speak for you. it is a place where you can speak.

                      Archives

                      Contact Us

                      info@4comculture.com

                      4comculture.com ©2011
                      The Spokane African American Voice ©2011

                      Proudly powered by WordPress
                       

                      Loading Comments...
                       

                        %d