Here’s a Burma-Shave-style series of signs with a **social justice theme**, ending with the message “No Kings.” Each line would appear on a separate sign, spaced out along a road:
Equal rights For every voice Justice fair Should be the choice No Kings
They hold the crown You hold the load Stand together Change the road No Kings
The power’s yours It’s in your hands Build a world That truly stands No Kings
Truth and love Will light the way No one rules We all have say No Kings
Each set of signs uses the rhythmic, rhyming style of the original Burma-Shave ads while conveying social justice themes like equality, collective power, and rejecting authoritarianism or hierarchical rule. The final line, “No Kings” delivers a punchy, memorable conclusion in the same way Burma-Shave signs ended with their product name.
Maybe you would like to add these to your protest signs.
Write your own rhyming verses and share them with us in a comment below.
What is Linguistic Imperialism? Linguistic imperialism refers to the dominance of one language over others, typically through the spread and establishment of the dominant language by colonial, economic, or cultural means. It often results in the marginalization of local languages and cultures.
Why and who benefits?
“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them” – Einstein
“No freedom before you first get free from the mental categories of those who would hold you in bondage.” – Ogunnaike
Create it in your mind. Create it in your words. Create It in your actions. – Unknown.
If you would like to have a discussion with Charles he can be contacted at performance2080@gmail.com
This article is inspired by an audit of Dr. King’s unfinished business and a speech given by Michael McPhearson at All Saint’s Lutheran Church in Spokane Washington. The occasion was the commemoration of the the 80th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The psychological traits of true believers in mass movements can be observed in the followers of contemporary political figures like Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, and Bernie Sanders.
Social media platforms are central tools in organizing, amplifying, and documenting protest movements, including both legal demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience. Their influence extends to nearly every phase of modern activism.
Key Functions of Social Media in Protests
Organization and Mobilization
Rapid Communication: Platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram enable instant alerts and updates to large audiences.
Event Coordination: Details about protest times, locations, and changes can be distributed quickly.
Recruitment: Movements reach new supporters, often beyond traditional activist circles.
Information Sharing
Education: Infographics, videos, and threads explain protest goals, legal rights, and safety tips.
Real-Time Updates: Live streams and posts provide on-the-ground news, especially when mainstream media coverage is lacking.
Resource Distribution: Legal aid contacts, medical help, or transportation details are easily shared.
Public Awareness and Narrative Control
Framing the Message: Movements can frame their demands and actions, independently of government or traditional media narratives.
Viral Content: Hashtags and viral posts can bring national or global attention to local issues quickly.
Documentation and Evidence
Recording Events: Videos and photos document both peaceful protest and any incidents of violence or repression.
Accountability: Livestreams and real-time sharing can deter misconduct by authorities and provide evidence for legal defense.
Solidarity and Morale
Community Building: Supporters express solidarity, encourage one another, and build a sense of collective purpose.
International Support: Protests in one country can inspire or support similar movements elsewhere. Risks and Challenges
Surveillance and Infiltration
Monitoring: Law enforcement may monitor public posts or infiltrate private groups.
Data Collection: Social media data can be used in prosecutions or to target activists.
Disinformation and Smear Campaigns
False Narratives: Opponents may spread misinformation or attempt to discredit the movement.
Trolling and Harassment: Activists may face online abuse or threats.
Privacy Concerns
Doxxing: Personal information may be exposed.
Platform Policies: Posts or accounts can be removed, limiting reach or erasing documentation. Best Practices for Protesters on Social Media
Use Encrypted Messaging Apps: For sensitive coordination, prefer Signal, Telegram (private chats), or similar platforms.
Limit Location Sharing: Disable geotags and avoid posting live locations unless necessary.
Use Pseudonyms: Protect personal identity where possible.
Fact-Check Information: Prevent spread of rumors or unverified claims.
Backup Important Content: Download key videos/photos in case accounts are suspended or content is removed. Conclusion
Social media is a double-edged sword: It empowers protest movements with unprecedented coordination and amplification, but also exposes activists to risks. Effective protest training now always includes a section on digital security, smart communication, and narrative control through social media.
With millions of people marching in the streets across the United States and 10,000 – 20,000 marching here in Spokane this would make a good topic for our local newspapers, comma and social media. It would also be an opportunity to disseminate strategic conversations across the nation.
The marchers are asking a fundamental question: How do we preserve democracy when so many of our neighbors seem willing to trade it for the promise of security?
It appears that there is a great deal of fear dividing our country in two. Why these fears, what needs to be done, and how can we do it? What do our readers think? What does our community think? What do others think?
This is a three part series. The first part describes the fears and what needs to be done to address them. The second part addresses why Black people should resist the loss of democracy, the third part deals with what needs to be done. Later articles can follow the progress of the Spokane fight for democracy.
The articles discuss various evidence-based approaches to enhance democratic resilience and social cohesion at government, institutional, and individual levels. They highlight the importance of economic interventions, leadership strategies, educational reforms, media responsibility, and personal engagement. The text outlines measures for specific demographic concerns while emphasizing the need for systemic changes and the importance of measuring success. Key factors for success include authenticity, inclusivity, patience, consistency, local focus, and bipartisan support.
Feedback from social media posts and interactions can be used to invite them to remove the fear, save democracy and participate in building a better community they want to live in.
Read the first article in the Fighting Fear series:
